· 9/22/2005
Deno v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 177 S.W.3d 753
- 2005 Ky. LEXIS 302
- 2005 WL 2317756
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- referring to a defendant’s request for cocounsel as requesting the right to hybrid representation
- A defendant, has the Fourth Amendment right to refuse to submit biological specimens; refusal to consent to search is, privileged conduct and cannot be considered as evidence of guilt
- A defendant has the Fourth Amendment right to refuse to submit biological specimens; refusal to consent to search is privileged conduct and cannot be considered as evidence of guilt
- A defendant has the Fourth Amendment right to refuse to submit biological specimens; refusal to consent to search is privileged conduct and cannot be considered as evidence of guilt
- A defendant has the Fourth Amendment right to refuse to submit biological specimens; refusal to consent to search is privileged conduct and cannot be considered as evidence of guilt
- A defendant has the Fourth Amendment right to refuse to submit biological specimens; refusal to consent to search is privileged conduct and cannot be considered as evidence of guilt
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lambert, Cooper, Graves, Johnstone, Roach, Scott, Wintersheimer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.