Kentucky Supreme Court· 9/22/2005

Deno v. Commonwealth

Citations

177 S.W.3d 753
2005 Ky. LEXIS 302
2005 WL 2317756

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

referring to a defendant’s request for cocounsel as requesting the right to hybrid representation
A defendant, has the Fourth Amendment right to refuse to submit biological specimens; refusal to consent to search is, privileged conduct and cannot be considered as evidence of guilt
A defendant has the Fourth Amendment right to refuse to submit biological specimens; refusal to consent to search is privileged conduct and cannot be considered as evidence of guilt
A defendant has the Fourth Amendment right to refuse to submit biological specimens; refusal to consent to search is privileged conduct and cannot be considered as evidence of guilt
A defendant has the Fourth Amendment right to refuse to submit biological specimens; refusal to consent to search is privileged conduct and cannot be considered as evidence of guilt
A defendant has the Fourth Amendment right to refuse to submit biological specimens; refusal to consent to search is privileged conduct and cannot be considered as evidence of guilt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lambert, Cooper, Graves, Johnstone, Roach, Scott, Wintersheimer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.