Skip to main content
· 9/22/2005

Deno v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 177 S.W.3d 753
  • 2005 Ky. LEXIS 302
  • 2005 WL 2317756

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • referring to a defendant’s request for cocounsel as requesting the right to hybrid representation
  • A defendant, has the Fourth Amendment right to refuse to submit biological specimens; refusal to consent to search is, privileged conduct and cannot be considered as evidence of guilt
  • A defendant has the Fourth Amendment right to refuse to submit biological specimens; refusal to consent to search is privileged conduct and cannot be considered as evidence of guilt
  • A defendant has the Fourth Amendment right to refuse to submit biological specimens; refusal to consent to search is privileged conduct and cannot be considered as evidence of guilt
  • A defendant has the Fourth Amendment right to refuse to submit biological specimens; refusal to consent to search is privileged conduct and cannot be considered as evidence of guilt
  • A defendant has the Fourth Amendment right to refuse to submit biological specimens; refusal to consent to search is privileged conduct and cannot be considered as evidence of guilt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lambert, Cooper, Graves, Johnstone, Roach, Scott, Wintersheimer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.