Denny v. Dana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We do not address arguments not supported by cogent argument or citation to pertinent authority.” (citing Blevins v. State, 2017 WY 43, ¶ 22, 393 P.3d 1249, 1254 (Wyo. 2017))
• officers developed reasonable suspicion based, in part, on what they knew about Mr. Pier’s association with Mr. Kelly, who was under investigation for drug trafficking, and Ms. Atkinson, who was a drug user

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).