Denniston v. Visscher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting an argument that emails are per se inadequate and “reaffirming our prior decisions that have held . . . an email will satisfy the statute of frauds so long as it[] . . . meet[s] all requirements of the governing statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).