Denniston v. Philadelphia Co.
Citations
- 161 Pa. 41
- 28 A. 1007
- 1894 Pa. LEXIS 629
Syllabus
<p>Eminent domain — Pipe line for gas.</p> <p>The inconvenience and injury caused by the location of a properly con•strueted and carefully operated pipe line may be considered in a proceeding for the assessment of damages to the land through which it passes, but such as are produced by the negligent construction and operation of the pipe line'cannot be considered in such a proceeding.</p> <p>Pipe line — Negligence—Leakage—Evidence.</p> <p>In a proceeding to assess damages for injuries resulting from the con•struction of a pipe line for gas, evidence that leakage of gas from the pipe line had destroyed a spring, and injured vegetation, is not proper for the •consideration of the jury, where there is nothing to show whether the leakage was the natural and ordinary consequence of the location and construction of the line, or was the result of the company’s negligence in ■constructing and operating the line.</p> <p>Evidence — Gross-examination—Defence.</p> <p>Matters of defence cannot be introduced on the cross-examination of .plaintiff’s witnesses.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- testimony eight months after decision to contest not sufficient basis to make out a reasonable contest
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dean, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Thompson, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.