Dennis v. Haden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding harm in precluding plaintiff from calling defendant’s former expert as rebuttal witness because his testimony was noncumulative and “would have allowed the jury to know that at least one previous expert hired by [the defendant] thought that [the defendant] was at fault to some extent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).