Dennis v. Employment Division

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the evidence must be sufficient to support the agency’s findings of fact and that the agency’s inferences from those facts must be reasonable
• explaining when express credibility findings are necessary to permit judicial review of supporting evidence
• where evidence appears to be strongly contrary to a referee’s findings, the referee should explain the findings in order to justify them to a reviewing court
• where evidence appears to be strongly contrary to a referee's findings, the referee should explain the findings in order to justify them to a reviewing court
• “ [T]he adjudication of unemployment benefits is more inquisitorial than adversarial____ [T]he referee must seek out all the relevant facts.” (footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).