Dennis v. Alves

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing Dodd-Frank retaliation claim where plaintiff failed to allege or show “his disclosure relates to a violation of federal securities laws.”
• “[T]he Court denies the anti-SLAPP motion and 25 request for fees without prejudice at this time. Defendants may renew their motion if 26 [plaintiff] includes amended state law claims in his second amended complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).