Dennis Strutton v. Linda Meade

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the decision not to impose sanctions was not an abuse of the district court’s considerable discretion where the destruction of evidence, while intentional, did not necessarily reflect a fraudulent intent to suppress the truth
• determining that “the temporary modifications in the treatment regimen of eliminating psychoeduca-tional classes and increasing the size of process groups was neither arbitrary nor egregious”
• determining that “the temporary modifications in the treatment regimen of eliminating psychoeducational classes and increasing the size of process groups was neither arbitrary nor egregious”
• “We remain cautious not to turn every alleged state law violation into a constitutional claim.”
• alteration in original; quoting Elizabeth M. v. Montenez, 458 F.3d 779, 788 (8th Cir. 2006)
• alteration in original; quoting Elizabeth M. v. Montenez, 458 F.3d 779, 788 (8th Cir. 2006)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).