· 7/1/2004
Dennis Leroy Hamilton v. A.C. Newland, Warden
Citations
- 374 F.3d 822
- 58 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1141
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 13614
- 2004 WL 1470516
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that habeas petitioner’s motion for reconsideration of denial of habeas relief must be treated as motion pursuant to Rule 60(b
- holding that habeas petitioner’s motion for reconsideration of denial of habeas relief must be treated as motion pursuant to Rule 60(b) where petitioner sought to have district court reconsider its prior ruling that his habeas claims were barred by the one-year limitations period under AEDPA
- holding that habeas petitioner's motion for reconsideration of denial of habeas relief must be treated as motion pursuant to Rule 60(b) where petitioner sought to have district court reconsider its prior ruling that his habeas claims were barred by the one-year limitations period under AEDPA
- holding that habeas petitioner’s motion for reconsideration of denial of habeas relief must be treated as motion pursuant to Rule 60(b) where petitioner sought to have district court reconsider its prior ruling that his habeas claims were barred by the one-year limitations period under AEDPA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schroeder, Thomas, Clifton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.