· 5/1/1995
Dennis H. Huguley Ruth E. Dunn v. General Motors Corporation
Citations
- 52 F.3d 1364
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 9818
- 105 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 723
- 1995 WL 248465
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the plaintiff has the burden to produce statistical evidence showing the disproportionately negative effects of the challenged policy on the protected group
- explaining that disparate treatment “occurs when an employer treats some employees less favorably than others because of race, religion, sex, or the like”
- “Unlike disparate impact, a disparate treatment claim obligates the plaintiff to show discriminatory intent or motive for a particular adverse employment decision.”
- “Unlike disparate impact, a disparate treatment claim obligates the plaintiff to show discriminatory intent or motive for a particular adverse employment decision.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wellford, Boggs, Siler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.