Skip to main content
· 5/1/1995

Dennis H. Huguley Ruth E. Dunn v. General Motors Corporation

Citations

  • 52 F.3d 1364
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 9818
  • 105 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 723
  • 1995 WL 248465

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the plaintiff has the burden to produce statistical evidence showing the disproportionately negative effects of the challenged policy on the protected group
  • explaining that disparate treatment “occurs when an employer treats some employees less favorably than others because of race, religion, sex, or the like”
  • “Unlike disparate impact, a disparate treatment claim obligates the plaintiff to show discriminatory intent or motive for a particular adverse employment decision.”
  • “Unlike disparate impact, a disparate treatment claim obligates the plaintiff to show discriminatory intent or motive for a particular adverse employment decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wellford, Boggs, Siler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.