Dennis Feyka v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the fact that the victim did not immediately report the defendant’s offenses was “insignificant” and did not support the defendant’s incredible dubiosity argument
• finding sufficient evidence to sustain child molesting convictions despite “the conflicting testimony and some inconsistencies in [the victim’s] own statements”
• finding sufficient evidence to sustain child Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A-CR-2803 | July 17, 2020 Page 7 of 9 molesting convictions despite “the conflicting testimony and some inconsistencies in [the victim’s] own statements”
• comments that only two people knew what happened and victim testified, that no one else was there to corroborate victim’s testimony, and that victim’s testimony was uncontested did not amount to fundamental error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).