Dennis Ex Rel. PICO Holdings, Inc. v. Hart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he Exchange Act does not so fully displace state law as to invoke complete preemption”
• “Complete preemption is a limited doctrine that applies only where a federal statutory scheme is so comprehensive that it supplants state law causes of action.”
• “[T]he Exchange Act does not so fully displace state law as to invoke complete preemption.”
• “[T]he Exchange Act does not so fully displace state law as to invoke complete preemption”
• “Complete preemption is a limited doctrine that applies only where a federal statutory 6 scheme is so comprehensive that it entirely supplants state law causes of action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).