Dennis Arndt v. Security Bank S.S.B. Employees' Pension Plan and Marshall & Ilsley Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that disability benefits are not retirement‐type benefits
• “What we need to decide is whether under ERISA [plaintiffs] benefits are accrued; are a retirement subsidy; or, on the other hand, whether they are disability benefits.”
• “Viewed from this angle, the benefit is a disability benefit. The disability is the reason for the benefit.”
• pension plan was first amended “to freeze the accrual of benefits” and over a year later, trustee “gave notice of its intent to terminate the [pension] plan”
• rejecting a similar argument with respect to disability benefits
• rejecting a similar argument with respect to disability benefits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).