Deniz v. Municipality of Guaynabo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that showing uncertainty as to whether an inverse condemnation proceeding exists does not satisfy plaintiffs burden to prove unavailability of the state remedy
• “Dressing a takings claim in the raiment of a due process violation does not serve to evade the exhaustion requirement.”
• regarding district court’s 12(b)(6) ruling “as a nullity” because district court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction
• regarding district court’s 12(b)(6) ruling “as a nullity” because district court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction
• “When a court is confronted with motions to dismiss under both Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), it ordinarily ought to decide the former before broaching the latter.”
• “A plaintiffs failure to exhaust the inverse condemnation remedy renders premature a section 1983 damages action predicated upon an alleged takings violation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).