Denis v. Attorney General of the United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a New York conviction for evidence tampering was “relat[ed] to” obstruction of justice within the meaning of the INA
• holding that a New York conviction for evidence tampering was \relat[ed] to\ obstruction of justice within the meaning of the INA
• recognizing that deference to an agency‟s reasonable interpretation of ambiguous statutory language would be appropriate
• holding that the question “does not present an obscure ambiguity or a matter committed to agency discretion” because Chapter 73 “permit[s] us to easily determine the types of conduct Congress intended the phrase to encompass”
• holding that the question “does not present an obscure ambiguity or a matter committed to agency discretion” because Chapter 73 “permit[s] us to easily determine the types of conduct Congress intended the phrase to encompass”
• explaining that we “apply the phrase ‘relating to’ broadly, seeking a logical or causal connection”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).