Skip to main content
· 6/5/1957

DENHAM ET UX v. Cuddeback

Citations

  • 311 P.2d 1014
  • 210 Or. 485
  • 1957 Ore. LEXIS 272

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a related purpose of the requirement to object during trial to any matter regarded as prejudicial is to prevent litigants from speculating on a verdict and then seeking a new trial if the verdict is against them
  • related purpose is to prevent litigants from speculating on verdict, then appealing if verdict is against them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Perry, Lusk, Brand, Warner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.