Denha v. Jacob

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming trial court’s determination that a claim for lost profits was speculative where “[t]he only evidence offered at trial regarding lost profits was plaintiff’s relatively brief testimony”
• parol evidence rule cannot be invoked either by or against a stranger to the contract
• “We agree with the majority of courts which hold that the parol evidence rule cannot be invoked either by or against a stranger to the contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).