Dengler v. State Farm Mutual Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a directed verdict was appropriate because there was no expert testimony connecting the injury at issue to the car accident
• the plaintiff presented expert testimony attempting to link his recurring headaches and subsequent subarachnoid hemorrhage to an automobile accident the prior year

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).