Deneny v. Van Rossem

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If a potential witness’s testimony would not unqualifiedly support a defendant, the failure to call such a witness does not constitute ineffective assistance.”
• \[E]vidence of a different kind or of different circumstances tending to establish or disprove the same fact is not cumulative [.]\
• “a juror misconduct claim amounting to a constitutional error can only be raised in a [post-conviction] motion when the factual basis of the juror misconduct was not discovered until after the trial”
• “a juror misconduct claim amounting to a constitutional error can only be raised in a [post-conviction] motion when the factual basis of the juror misconduct was not discovered until after the trial” (citing State v. Wilson, 812 S.W.2d 213, 216 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).