Deneen v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that based on “this Congressional authorization of nationwide service of process” and Rule 4, Section 27 provides personal jurisdiction upon service without application of the traditional minimum contacts test
• recognizing “[a] single act of negligence creates only one cause of action[.]”
• the defendant, a resident citizen of the United States, had sufficient contacts with the United States to support the fairness of exercise of jurisdiction over him by a United States court
• “[T]here can be no question but that the defendant, a resident citizen of the United States, has sufficient contacts with the United States to support the fairness of the exercise of jurisdiction over him by a United States court.”
• “[T]here can be no question but that the defendant, a resident citizen of the United States, has sufficient contacts with the United States to support the fairness of the exercise of jurisdiction over him by a United States court.”
• “Here the sovereign is the United States, and there can be no question but that the defendant, a resident citizen of the United States, has sufficient contacts with the United States to support the fairness of the exercise of jurisdiction over him by a United States court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).