Skip to main content
· 7/11/2001

Dendrite Intern., Inc. v. Doe No. 3

Citations

  • 775 A.2d 756
  • 342 N.J. Super. 134

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding consideration of requests to compel production of anonymous speaker’s identity “must be undertaken and analyzed on a case-by-case basis”
  • concluding consideration of requests to compel production of anonymous speaker's identity \must be undertaken and analyzed on a case-by-case basis\
  • denying motion for expedited discovery to obtain identity of ISP subscriber due to failure to establish prima facie defamation claim
  • requiring plaintiff to “set forth a prima facie cause of action”
  • “[Notification efforts should include posting a message of notification of the identity discovery request to the anonymous user on the ISP’s pertinent message board.”
  • “Dendrite failed to establish a sufficient nexus between John Doe No. 3’s statements and Dendrite’s allegations of harm”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Stern, A.A. Rodrãguez and Fall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.