Denbina v. City of Hurst

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that note holder may “waive the exercise of the option” to accelerate note after it “already exercised its option”
• finding that noteholder abandoned acceleration when it took a nonsuit on a counterclaim
• “[T]he City had a right to withdraw or revoke its option 29 to accelerate payment, and effectively expressed its intent to do so by taking a non-suit”
• The City filed a nonsuit of its accelerated claims with the court.
• whether holder has accelerated note is a fact question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).