DeNardo v. Maassen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that \adverse rulings alone are [not] sufficient to require recusal\ (citing Wasserman, 38 P.3d at 1171) (alteration added)
• holding no abuse of discretion in pre-litigation screening order because it was \appropriately tailored to the particular circumstances of [the] case\
• \Our past holdings demonstrate that neither interpretations of the law nor adverse rulings alone are sufficient to require recusal.\ (footnotes omitted)
• \A party may waive the right to an evidentiary hearing on disputed material questions of fact by failing to request one before the court rules on the matter.\
• “[P]rocedural due process under the Alaska Constitution requires notice and opportunity for hearing appropriate to the nature of the case.” (alteration in original) (quoting Price v. Eastham, 75 P.3d 1051, 1056 (Alaska 2003))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).