Den-Gar Enterprises v. Romero

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that plaintiffs who sought to remove a cloud on title through a quiet title action could recover attorney fees under a slander of title claim
• considering evidence that grantee did not record the deed until at least a year after physical conveyance as relevant to parties’ intent and understanding at the time of conveyance
• considering evidence of grantor’s earlier transfer to his mother, in addition to grantor’s words and actions at, prior, and subsequent to delivery, and concluding that the grantor did not intend to convey the title to the subject property
• plaintiff entitled to attorney fees incurred to clear title in action that joined quiet-title and slander-of-title claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).