Skip to main content
· 3/28/2014

Demyanovich v. Cadon Plating & Coatings, L.L.C.

Citations

  • 747 F.3d 419
  • 22 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 496
  • 29 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 762
  • 2014 WL 1259603
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 5737

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiff can show pretext by demonstrating that an employer’s proffered reason for an adverse employment action has “no basis in fact”
  • explaining that a plaintiff may establish pretext by showing that the employer’s stated reason did not actually motivate the adverse employment action
  • noting that under the ADA “the plaintiff's disability must be a ‘but for’ cause of the adverse employment action”
  • identifying that the McDonnell Douglas framework applies in the context of FMLA claims
  • requiring a showing that plaintiff suffered an adverse employment action for general disability discrimination claim
  • finding genuine issues of material fact on the question of employer integration where the two employers at issue “shared several common managers”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Griffin, Korman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.