Skip to main content
· 11/20/1964

Dempster Bros., Inc. v. United States Fidelity & G. Co.

Citations

  • 388 S.W.2d 153
  • 54 Tenn. App. 65
  • 1964 Tenn. App. LEXIS 146

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the term “agent” is not inconsistent with the term “independent contractor”; “independent contractor” contrasts with “servant,” and both are agents of their principal
  • duty to defend covering any situation where allegations of complaint suggest possibility of coverage
  • “[W]here the allegations of the complaint against the insured are ambiguous or incomplete and it is doubtful whether ... they state a cause of action within the coverage of the policy ..., such doubt will be resolved in favor of the insured.”
  • “[W]here the allegations of the complaint against the insured are ambiguous or incomplete and it is doubtful whether or not they state a cause of action within the coverage of the policy ... such doubt will be resolved in favor of the insured.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McAmis, Cooper, Parrott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.