· 5/8/2002
DeMoss v. Hamilton
Citations
- 644 N.W.2d 302
- 2002 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 85
- 2002 WL 873154
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he question is which conduct is relevant to the cause of action.”
- the plaintiff’s failure to stop smoking, have regular follow-up examinations, lose weight, and begin an exercise program after a heart attack provided the occasion for medical treatment, but was irrelevant to the question of defendant’s medical negligence
- the plaintiff’s failure to stop smoking, have regular follow-up examinations, lose weight, and begin an exercise program after a heart attack provided the occasion for medical treatment, but was irrelevant to the question of defendant’s medical negligence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Neuman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.