· 1/15/1998
DEMOCRATIC STATE COMMITTEE v. Bebchick
Citations
- 706 A.2d 569
- 1998 D.C. App. LEXIS 10
- 1998 WL 12568
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that to state a claim for interference with prospective economic advantage “a plaintiff must allege ‘business expectancies, not grounded on present contractual relationships, but which are commercially reasonable to anticipate’” (emphasis added
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Steadman, Farrell, Ruiz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.