Skip to main content
· 1/15/1998

DEMOCRATIC STATE COMMITTEE v. Bebchick

Citations

  • 706 A.2d 569
  • 1998 D.C. App. LEXIS 10
  • 1998 WL 12568

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that to state a claim for interference with prospective economic advantage “a plaintiff must allege ‘business expectancies, not grounded on present contractual relationships, but which are commercially reasonable to anticipate’” (emphasis added

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steadman, Farrell, Ruiz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.