Skip to main content

Demir v. Schollmeier

Citations

  • 273 So. 3d 59

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a trial court’s denial of a rule 1.540 motion to vacate is ordinarily reviewed for an abuse of discretion, however, when the entered judgment is void, the trial court has no discretion, and is required to vacate the judgment
  • “[S]ubstituted service by publication under section 49.011 is not authorized for this type of action, which sought a money judgment premised on an alleged breach of contract[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.