· 1/7/2020
Deminski v. State
Syllabus
Constitutional right to Education, Leandro, DOT v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that plaintiff’s “concern about preemption and its regulatory fallout is too speculative”
- “Accordingly, for substantially the same reasons set forth above with respect to Article III standing, we hold that DFS’s APA claims are not constitutionally ripe.”
- stating requirements of Article III standing to establish injury for the purpose of wage notice provisions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.