Skip to main content
· 1/7/2020

Deminski v. State

Syllabus

Constitutional right to Education, Leandro, DOT v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that plaintiff’s “concern about preemption and its regulatory fallout is too speculative”
  • “Accordingly, for substantially the same reasons set forth above with respect to Article III standing, we hold that DFS’s APA claims are not constitutionally ripe.”
  • stating requirements of Article III standing to establish injury for the purpose of wage notice provisions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.