DEMETRIUS EUGENE JOHNSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff “must, of course, be able to show a causal connection between the price discrimination in violation of the Act and the injury suffered”
• holding that having a sixty percent-owned subsidiary was sufficient control
• implying that disfavored purchaser must show more than mere price difference to recover damages
• reinstating jury verdict based on injury indirectly caused by price discrimination in violation of the Robinson-Patman Act
• implying that disfavored purchaser must show more than mere price difference to recover damages
• finding actionable price discrimination resulting in injury to competition between disfavored purchaser and customer of customer of favored purchaser, but not categorizing the case as third-line or fourth-line discrimination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).