Skip to main content
· 4/4/1989

Demary v. Yamaha Motor Corp.

Citations

  • 125 F.R.D. 20
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7556
  • 1989 WL 32011

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A stay of civil discovery is sometimes appropriate to protect competing interests arising from parallel civil and criminal proceedings involving the same subject matter.” (Emphasis added.)
  • \A stay of civil discovery is sometimes appropriate to protect competing interests arising from parallel civil and criminal proceedings involving the same subject matter\ (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ponsor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.