Skip to main content
· 9/14/2007

Demary v. Castillo

Citations

  • 963 So. 2d 1001
  • 2007 La. LEXIS 1910
  • 2007 WL 2701242

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in determining whether sequestration order was violated, trial court was entitled to credit defense counsel’s assertions and was not required to conduct evidentiary hearing
  • trial court was not required to conduct evidentiary hearing prior to barring witness’ testimony as sanction for violation of sequestration order given ‘‘effectively uncontested’’ rep- resentations by prosecutor and defense counsel, and defendant’s failure to request evidentiary hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.