Demarco v. Town of Hopkinton Tax Assessor, 94-400 (1995)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Asking [the employee] to undergo a psychological evaluation is not enough to suggest that Home Depot regarded [the employee] as mentally disabled.”
• affirming dismissal of retaliation claim because the “abusive remarks” and harassment that plaintiff complained about are not illegal under the KCRA
• “Asking [the employee] to undergo a psychological evaluation is not enough to suggest that Home Depot regarded [the employee] as mentally disabled.”
• “Asking [the employee] to undergo a psychological evaluation is not enough to suggest that Home Depot regarded [the employee] as mentally disabled.”
• “[A] prima facie case under the McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973), framework is an evidentiary standard, not a pleading standard.”
• “The requirement that a protected activity be alleged is necessary to state a claim under [Kentucky’s discrimination statute which is consonant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).