Demar v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, even in a criminal case, a defendant can be convicted on the uncorroborated testimony of an admitted perjurer, a convicted felon, or an accomplice
• “Plaintiff seems to suggest that, based on John Doe’s identity, it would be clear that he was an unreliable informer. The illogic of the argument is manifest. There is no relationship between Doe’s name and his reliability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).