Skip to main content
Third Circuit· 3/24/1959

Delzona Corp. v. Sacks

Citations

  • 265 F.2d 157
  • 1 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 968

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting a Rule 60(b) motion where “the matter has been litigated and concluded heretofore”
  • two years between entry of judgment pursuant to parties’ stipulation and filing of rule 60 [b] [6] motion not “reasonable time” where defendant acquired knowledge forming grounds for rule 60 [b] [6] relief at least seven months before filing
  • “What constitutes a 4 Compare Cox v. Horn, 757 F.3d 113, 116 (3d Cir. 2014) (deeming ninety-day delay reasonable in the Rule 60 context), with Martinez-McBean v. Gov’t of Virgin Islands, 562 F.2d 908, 913 n.7 (3d Cir. 1977

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodrich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.