Skip to main content
· 11/16/2001

DeLuca v. Bear Stearns & Co.

Citations

  • 175 F. Supp. 2d 102
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20944
  • 87 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 782
  • 2001 WL 1590543

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that consideration exists where “absent an exception, an at-will employee can be terminated for refusal to sign an arbitration agreement” and “if plaintiff were an at-will employee, her continuing to work would provide the necessary consideration for the new arbitration agreement”
  • granting enforcement of settlement despite “under duress” notation where “[plaintiff] points to no action by Govindarajan would release her claims in this litigation for a $5 million payment from Defendants. (See ECF No. 155 at 11-17

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Saris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.