Delphino v. State
Citations
- 11 Tex. Ct. App. 30
Syllabus
<p>1. Continuance — Practice in this Court.— Refusal of a continuance will not be revised on appeal unless the transcript brings up a bill of exceptions duly reserved.</p> <p>2. Misnomer.—A middle name or initial is not recognized by law, nor is its omission or misrecital a matter of any legal significance, unless it appears that injury resulted therefrom to a different person than the one intended.</p> <p>3. Same—Variance.—Indictment for theft alleged the stolen animals to be the property of F. A. Fater; but the proof showed that the middle initial of the owner’s name was R. Held, not a variance, but a discrepancy of no legal significance.</p>
Judges: Winkler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.