Delph v. Dr. Pepper Bottling Co. of Paragould, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the use of the word [nigger] even in jest could be evidence of racial antipathy.”
• upholding hostile work environment claim where the plaintiff had been subjected to \a steady barrage of racial name-calling at the [defendant’s] facility\
• upholding a hostile work environment claim where the plaintiff was subjected to a “steady barrage of racial name-calling”
• finding hostile work environment where plaintiff was subjected to “a steady barrage of racial name-calling” at workplace
• reducing $150,000 compensatory damages award to $50,000 because emotional complaints were vague, ill-defined, and not intense
• recognizing “black boy” as a racial slur.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).