· 10/23/1899
Deloughrey v. Hinds
Citations
- 23 Mont. 260
- 58 P. 709
- 1899 Mont. LEXIS 99
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “alimony” was composed of two separate elements: “a division of the marital assets and liabilities” and “periodic payments for sustenance and support.”
- “It is inadvisable, and in practice impossible, for any court to attempt to set down a flat rule concerning property division in a divorce.”
- court declined to adopt a flat rule for the division of property because it would impede the trial court's exercise of discretion for the varying facts and circumstances in each case
- “[A] trial court’s discretion, though broad, is not unlimited.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.