Skip to main content
· 10/23/1899

Deloughrey v. Hinds

Citations

  • 23 Mont. 260
  • 58 P. 709
  • 1899 Mont. LEXIS 99

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “alimony” was composed of two separate elements: “a division of the marital assets and liabilities” and “periodic payments for sustenance and support.”
  • “It is inadvisable, and in practice impossible, for any court to attempt to set down a flat rule concerning property division in a divorce.”
  • court declined to adopt a flat rule for the division of property because it would impede the trial court's exercise of discretion for the varying facts and circumstances in each case
  • “[A] trial court’s discretion, though broad, is not unlimited.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.