Skip to main content
· 4/18/2006

Delores M. Brooks v. County Commission, Jefferson

Citations

  • 446 F.3d 1160
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 9636
  • 87 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,347
  • 97 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1587

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming district court’s denial of summary judgment where plaintiff failed to show directly or indirectly that the defendant’s proffered reason was pretextual or unworthy of credence
  • noting we are not concerned with an appellant’s “belie[f] that she was more qualified”
  • stating the same in the context of a Title VII failure-to-promote claim
  • A plaintiff has the burden of producing “sufficient evidence” for a reasonable factfinder to “conclude [defendant’s] articulated reasons were not believable.”
  • summarily finding that employer’s proffered reason that the candidate was selected over the plaintiff was a sufficient nondiscriminatory reason for the employer’s decision
  • “a plaintiff cannot prove pretext by simply arguing or even by showing that he was better, qualified than the officer who received the position he coveted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dubina, Hull, Marcus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.