· 1/24/1992
Delk v. DEPT. OF PRO. REGULATION
Citations
- 595 So. 2d 966
- 1992 WL 9648
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that regulatory board’s determination that a dentist violated a statute for which he was never charged was error
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.