Skip to main content
· 1/24/1992

Delk v. DEPT. OF PRO. REGULATION

Citations

  • 595 So. 2d 966
  • 1992 WL 9648

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that regulatory board’s determination that a dentist violated a statute for which he was never charged was error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.