Skip to main content
· 10/7/2013

DeliverMed Holdings, LLC v. Michael Schaltenbrand

Citations

  • 734 F.3d 616
  • 108 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1207
  • 2013 WL 5524862
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 20456

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “courts can demand” and that “a litigant should demonstrate” a certain evidentiary showing (emphasis added)
  • “Given its obvious potential for abuse, we must strongly caution both courts and litigants to be wary of using this device in the future.”
  • “As a consequence of their successful defense of an infringement suit, Defendants are entitled to a ‘very strong’ presumption in favor of receiving attorneys’ fees.”
  • “Given its obvious potential for abuse, we must strongly caution both courts and litigants to be wary of using this device in the future.”
  • “[T]he statute obligates courts to obtain an opinion from the Register . . . .”
  • “[T]he automatic stay of actions against the debtor ends at the close of its bankruptcy case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Williams, Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.