· 10/7/2013
DeliverMed Holdings, LLC v. Michael Schaltenbrand
Citations
- 734 F.3d 616
- 108 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1207
- 2013 WL 5524862
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 20456
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “courts can demand” and that “a litigant should demonstrate” a certain evidentiary showing (emphasis added)
- “Given its obvious potential for abuse, we must strongly caution both courts and litigants to be wary of using this device in the future.”
- “As a consequence of their successful defense of an infringement suit, Defendants are entitled to a ‘very strong’ presumption in favor of receiving attorneys’ fees.”
- “Given its obvious potential for abuse, we must strongly caution both courts and litigants to be wary of using this device in the future.”
- “[T]he statute obligates courts to obtain an opinion from the Register . . . .”
- “[T]he automatic stay of actions against the debtor ends at the close of its bankruptcy case.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook, Williams, Hamilton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.