Skip to main content
· 4/26/2007

Delgado v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority

Citations

  • 485 F. Supp. 2d 453
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30927
  • 2007 WL 1227479

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that plaintiff “must give specific dates of retaliatory actions” in order to allege temporal proximity
  • noting that in the Second Circuit “materially adverse changes include termination, demotion evidenced by decrease in wage or salary, a less distinguished title, loss of benefits, or diminished responsibilities.”
  • dismissing plaintiff’s Title VII claims for failure to plead specific events or more details to support her disparate treatment claims beyond broadly asserting that there were comparator employees outside her protected class who were treated better than her
  • “A complaint consisting only of assertions, setting forth no specific facts upon which a court could find a plausible violation of Title VII, must be dismissed for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6).”
  • “[Plaintiff] must plead circumstances leading to a permissible inference of racial discrimination including: ethnically degrading terms, invidious comments about [his] protected group, or sufficient factual assertions that employees not in [his] protected group were favored.”
  • “A complaint consisting only of assertions, setting forth no specific facts upon which a court could find a plausible violation of Title VII, must be dismissed for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marrero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.