· 4/1/2014
Deleon v. New York City Sanitation Department
Citations
- 116 A.D.3d 404
- 983 N.Y.S.2d 17
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that we would “take the district court at its word” when it described its sentence
- reviewing a decision of a U.S. district court involving a challenge to FBAR penalties
- remanding to the agency to recalculate plaintiff’s tax penalties because, “[o]rdinarily, if an agency has misapplied the law the case must be remanded to the agency to make a new determination.” (internal quotation marks omitted and alterations accepted)
- “The remand we now direct is not for the IRS to issue new penalties, but for it to recalculate the penalties it has already assessed.”
- “Given the agency’s error, the district court should have remanded Schwarzbaum’s FBAR penalties to the IRS for recalculation.”
- “The time of an FBAR violation is June 30, the annual FBAR filing deadline.” (quotation marks, brackets, and citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Degrasse
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.