Delcourt v. Silverman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that psychiatrist and guardian ad litem appointed to advise court on child custody matters were entitled to immunity
• holding that psychiatrist and guardian ad litem appointed to advise court on child custody matters were entitled to immunity
• court appointed psychologist and guardian ad litem appointed under article 11.10 of the Texas Family Code
• psychologist appointed to evaluate children in custody dispute entitled to absolute immunity by fulfilling \quasi-judicial functions intimately related to the judicial process\
• psychologist appointed to evaluate children in custody dispute entitled to absolute immunity by fulfilling “quasi-judicial functions intimately related to the judicial process”
• “[A] party is entitled to absolute immunity when the party is acting as an integral part of the judicial system or an ‘arm of the court.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).