Delchamps, Inc. v. Morgan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where this Court held that, as a matter of law, Delchamps could have entertained an honest and strong suspicion that store property had been concealed
• where this Court held that, as a matter of law, Delchamps could have entertained an honest and strong suspicion that store property had been concealed
• where this Court held that, as a matter of law, Delchamps could have entertained an honest and strong suspicion that store property had been concealed
• where the question of probable cause was held to be one of law
• substituted opinion on rehearing released July 17, 1992

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).