· 8/1/1935
Delaware TP. v. Central-Penn Nat. Bank of Philadelphia
Citations
- 79 F.2d 255
- 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4076
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting the plaintiff's request for a contingency-based enhancement and specifically rejecting the argument \that we should examine the contingency of Social Security cases as a class rather than assessing the riskiness of a particular case\
- rejecting the plaintiffs request for a contingency-based enhancement and specifically rejecting the argument “that we should examine the contingency of Social Security cases as a class rather than assessing the riskiness of a particular case”
- declarations of attorneys regarding the 16 prevailing market rate in the community may be sufficient to establish reasonable hourly rate
- declarations by attorneys regarding the prevailing 11 market rate in the community may be enough to establish a reasonable rate in the market
- reasonableness 15 determined by such factors as the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved, the skill requisite 16 to perform the legal service properly, and the experience, reputation, and ability of the attorney
- reasonableness determined by such factors as the novelty and difficulty of the 14 questions involved, the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly, and the experience, 15 reputation, and ability of the attorney
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.