Delasoft, Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of Adm. Servs.

Citations

• 2022 Ohio 3403

Syllabus

Trial court did not err by dismissing claims for injunctive relief seeking to stop award of state contract as moot because performance of the contract had commenced before appellant sought injunctive relief. Although the contract was for goods and services, the trial court appropriately analogized it to a public improvement contract because the project involved was one where one task substantially built on what had previously been done and a shift in providers would result in a significant burden to taxpayers. Appellant failed to establish that the capable-of-repetition exception to the mootness doctrine should be applied. Trial court did not err by dismissing Section 1983 claims because the complaint relied on supervisory authority alone, rather than any direct participation by the named defendants.