Court of Claims· 7/26/1968
Delano v. United States
Citations
- 185 Ct. Cl. 805
- 183 Ct. Cl. 379
- 1968 WL 4069
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \A strong indication of the reasonableness of that [administrative] construction is the fact that [the regulated parties] never challenged it\ even though it was \consistently maintained by the agency.\
- \A strong indication of the reasonableness of that [administrative] construction is the fact that [the regulated parties] never challenged it\ even though it was \consistently maintained by the agency.\
- “A strong indication of the reasonableness of that [administrative] construction is the fact that [the regulated parties] never challenged it” even though it was “consistently maintained by the agency.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- General Motors Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. William D. Ruckelshaus, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, (3 Cases)D.C. Circuit· 1984-09-07· cited 169×
- John A. Henneberger v. The United StatesCourt of Claims· 1968-11-15· cited 12×
- Arnold Cornman v. The United StatesCourt of Claims· 1969-04-11· cited 12×
- General Motors Corp. v. RuckelshausD.C. Circuit· 1983-12-16· cited 9×
- Consumer Life Insurance v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1975-10-22· cited 8×
- Acuna v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1973-06-20· cited 6×
- Louis Mossbauer v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1976-08-18· cited 3×
- Malandra v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1971-06-11· cited 1×
- Unnamed caseD.C. Circuit· 1983-12-16
Other cases named Delano v. United States
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.